Divorce cases by definition represent legally complex and emotionally challenging proceedings says Emily Doskow. The essential difficulties of divorce proceedings magnify if you are a woman facing a husband with self-centered or even narcissistic tendencies. Specific tips and strategies exist to allow you to best protected your rights and interests in this type of marriage dissolution situation.
Legal Counsel
Despite possessing the right to represent yourself in divorce proceedings, when there is a narcissistic man on the other wide of the aisle, seriously consider hiring an advocate. Perhaps no other tip is more important than engaging experienced legal representation to act on your behalf. Or you can get legal counseling help for 24*7 from +919962999008.
Mediation
With or without legal representation, another strategy to employ as you proceed to divorce a narcissistic man is mediation. The mediation process involves the appointment of a trained mediator---who specializes in family law matters---to work with you and your husband to resolve issues in your case.. Although the mediator does not make decisions for you, she works to assist you and your spouse in negotiating a settlement of issues in your case.
A mediator is a valuable resource in cases involving a spouse that is more focused on himself than on what is legally permitted or even in the best interests of children.
Written Communication
A helpful tip regarding communication with a narcissistic husband is to put everything in writing. Written communication serves a number of objectives, including relieving you of what very well may be unpleasant phone or face-to-face conversations with your husband.
Email is an acceptable form of written communication; text or instant messaging are not appropriate. Through email communication, you do not need to make immediate responses to communications from your husband. With text or instant messaging you can fall victim to making knee-jerk responses to your self-centered spouse, communications that might not be in your own best interests.
Counseling or Therapy
After living with a narcissistic husband, you may have developed self esteem or other issues. Consider seeking out a counselor or therapy to assist you with any emotional matters afflicting you in the aftermath of your marriage. By addressing these issues you will find yourself empowered to better protect your rights and interests in your divorce proceedings.
From TEAM Daniel & Daniel
To talk to our team for Legal Counseling call: 9884559660
Email:- matrimonialsolutions@hotmail.com
Monday, January 16, 2012
Divorce Tourism- with Marriage Counselling, a new trend.
If you're experiencing marital strife, the thought of sharing your two-week holiday in the Maldives with a marriage guidance counsellor may not be conducive to patching things up.
Now Indian travel firm's idea to use holidays to pull couples back from the brink of divorce catches on, the concept could be heading for Britain.
Mumbai-based KV Tours and Travels is offering 'divorce tourism' packages where couples are accompanied by a relationship counsellor to encourage them to give things another go.
Despite the fact that India has one of the world's lowest divorce rates with one in 100 married couples breaking up, it is apparently on the rise.
KV Tours and Travels chief executive Vijesh Thakker, who was inspired by the break-up of a friend's marriage, said: 'With divorce tourism, what we're trying to do is to bring together couples who are heading towards divorce to stop them.
'Nowadays divorce rates are rising, so we need to sort it out. It's a good thing we're doing. And we're helping domestic and international governments by promoting tourism.
'We're not destiny changers, we want them to treat the trip like a second honeymoon.'
Clinical psychologist and psychotherapist Rhea Pravin Tembhekar said the idea might work in some cases - but not all.
She said: 'If you're fighting about trivial things, like time management or in-laws issues - "my mother, your mother, my money, your money, etcetera" - maybe a holiday might work.
'But sometimes the issues are very critical, like domestic violence. You can't go on holiday and resolve that.'
Daneil & Daniel’s Managing partner Mr.K.P.Satish kumar said this kind of tourism reduces the misunderstanding between the couples and helps to reduce the divorce rates.
From TEAM Daniel & Daniel
Exclusive Divorce Law Firm
To talk to the Top divorce law expert @ 9884559660.
Email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
Now Indian travel firm's idea to use holidays to pull couples back from the brink of divorce catches on, the concept could be heading for Britain.
Mumbai-based KV Tours and Travels is offering 'divorce tourism' packages where couples are accompanied by a relationship counsellor to encourage them to give things another go.
Despite the fact that India has one of the world's lowest divorce rates with one in 100 married couples breaking up, it is apparently on the rise.
KV Tours and Travels chief executive Vijesh Thakker, who was inspired by the break-up of a friend's marriage, said: 'With divorce tourism, what we're trying to do is to bring together couples who are heading towards divorce to stop them.
'Nowadays divorce rates are rising, so we need to sort it out. It's a good thing we're doing. And we're helping domestic and international governments by promoting tourism.
'We're not destiny changers, we want them to treat the trip like a second honeymoon.'
Clinical psychologist and psychotherapist Rhea Pravin Tembhekar said the idea might work in some cases - but not all.
She said: 'If you're fighting about trivial things, like time management or in-laws issues - "my mother, your mother, my money, your money, etcetera" - maybe a holiday might work.
'But sometimes the issues are very critical, like domestic violence. You can't go on holiday and resolve that.'
Daneil & Daniel’s Managing partner Mr.K.P.Satish kumar said this kind of tourism reduces the misunderstanding between the couples and helps to reduce the divorce rates.
From TEAM Daniel & Daniel
Exclusive Divorce Law Firm
To talk to the Top divorce law expert @ 9884559660.
Email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
Sunday, January 15, 2012
After divorce bringing child to another place
A court can grant leave or permission to a person who has custody of a minor child to remove the minor child from the current jurisdiction to live in another jurisdiction. The determining factor on whether or not to allow removal is the best interest of the child standard. The party seeking the right to remove has the burden of showing that the removal is in the best interest of the minor child. To temporarily remove a child from the jurisdiction, the party doing the removal shall inform the other parent or parent's attorney. The removing party shall also provide telephone contact information as well as a prospective date of return. If the removal is to another part of the same state, the custodial party is not required to seek court permission. There are several factors that are considered when determining the child's best interest and include: Will the move enhance the life of the child and of the custodial parent? Is the removal simply an effort to frustrate visitation with the non-custodial parent? What is the motive of the non-custodial parent in frustrating the removal? The court must consider the child's interest in having a healthy can close relationship with both parents as well as other family members. The visitation rights of the non-custodial parent must be considered. Will visitation be realistic and feasible?
A full consideration of the benefits that a child can derive from the financial and emotional well-being of a custodial parent is required. Courts may allow removal when the custodial parent remarries a person from another state. The child may benefit by having the custodial parent closer to the new spouse.
A better job opportunity has also been used as grounds for removal. The increased earnings will allow for a better lifestyle for the child. Currently, there has been a trend against removal. The emphasis seems to be placed more directly on the best interest of the child and less on the opportunity of the custodial parent.
If the non-custodial parent has been highly involved in the child's life, removal would be very difficult to obtain and would provide a hardship to the entire family. The conduct of the non-custodial parent is a major factor in whether or not to allow removal. If the non-custodial parent is absent from the child's life Article Search, the court will be more likely to grant the removal.
From TEAM Daniel & Daniel
Helpline:- 9962999008
email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
A full consideration of the benefits that a child can derive from the financial and emotional well-being of a custodial parent is required. Courts may allow removal when the custodial parent remarries a person from another state. The child may benefit by having the custodial parent closer to the new spouse.
A better job opportunity has also been used as grounds for removal. The increased earnings will allow for a better lifestyle for the child. Currently, there has been a trend against removal. The emphasis seems to be placed more directly on the best interest of the child and less on the opportunity of the custodial parent.
If the non-custodial parent has been highly involved in the child's life, removal would be very difficult to obtain and would provide a hardship to the entire family. The conduct of the non-custodial parent is a major factor in whether or not to allow removal. If the non-custodial parent is absent from the child's life Article Search, the court will be more likely to grant the removal.
From TEAM Daniel & Daniel
Helpline:- 9962999008
email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
Thursday, December 29, 2011
How to prevent your Divorce
With the divorce rate so high many couples who are in stormy marriages feel that there is no way to save my marriage. It’s easy to think that if all those people can’t make it we can’t either. If you still love your mate and you think that you are loved in return then your marriage has a good chance of succeeding.
There are two of you in the marriage and both of you must want to make it work. Following are some tips that can help bring you together again and increase the chances of your marriage lasting:
1. No marriage is perfect. Unlike fairy tales, typical marriages have their flaws just like each of us has. Do not expect perfection from each other. Accept that there will be lumps and bumps along the way.
2. Having a successful marriage requires that you both work at it to make it strong. The more work that you put into your marriage will result in an honest and happy relationship. Not taking this seriously can be detrimental. The areas that typically need the most work involve trust and respect in one another. Without these things, your relationship will fall apart.
3. Communicate with each other. Create an environment where you can talk and listen to each other without getting upset. Speak calmly and clearly about how you feel and allow your partner to do the same. Make sure to listen to what they have to say, regardless of what they say. Discuss how each of you feels and try to find common ground where both of you feel that you can find solutions for issues you are facing. The more open and honest you are with each other, the better.
4. Let the problems of the past stay in the past. Do not dwell on them. Do not let past mistakes or misunderstandings determine the future of your marriage. While your past problems may be quite serious, dwelling on them will not help your marriage. Focus on the here and now and take each day as it comes. Each day has enough problems of its own.
5. Be more conscious of one another. Be considerate of each other’s needs and feelings. You can make thoughtful gestures to simply show that you are thinking of them. If you are unsure as to what you should do for your spouse, ask them what you can do to make them happy. Doing something that will make them feel loved and special can go a long way towards strengthening your relationship. Sometimes doing the simplest things can mean the most to them.
If you have tried all of the above and still are asking how to save my marriage, a professional marriage counselor may be your best option. The decision to go to a counselor must be made by both of you as it will not work if you both do not participate fully.
If you are both truly committed to making changes to save your marriage, a counselor can offer unbiased advice to help you. By getting advice from counselor, it may help you see your problems in a different light and help you find solutions.
TEAM Daniel & Boaz
Chennai Top Divorce Law Firm
Helpline:- 9962999008
email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
Daniel & Boaz deals all kind of matrimonial problems giving 24*7 support for your legal needs.
There are two of you in the marriage and both of you must want to make it work. Following are some tips that can help bring you together again and increase the chances of your marriage lasting:
1. No marriage is perfect. Unlike fairy tales, typical marriages have their flaws just like each of us has. Do not expect perfection from each other. Accept that there will be lumps and bumps along the way.
2. Having a successful marriage requires that you both work at it to make it strong. The more work that you put into your marriage will result in an honest and happy relationship. Not taking this seriously can be detrimental. The areas that typically need the most work involve trust and respect in one another. Without these things, your relationship will fall apart.
3. Communicate with each other. Create an environment where you can talk and listen to each other without getting upset. Speak calmly and clearly about how you feel and allow your partner to do the same. Make sure to listen to what they have to say, regardless of what they say. Discuss how each of you feels and try to find common ground where both of you feel that you can find solutions for issues you are facing. The more open and honest you are with each other, the better.
4. Let the problems of the past stay in the past. Do not dwell on them. Do not let past mistakes or misunderstandings determine the future of your marriage. While your past problems may be quite serious, dwelling on them will not help your marriage. Focus on the here and now and take each day as it comes. Each day has enough problems of its own.
5. Be more conscious of one another. Be considerate of each other’s needs and feelings. You can make thoughtful gestures to simply show that you are thinking of them. If you are unsure as to what you should do for your spouse, ask them what you can do to make them happy. Doing something that will make them feel loved and special can go a long way towards strengthening your relationship. Sometimes doing the simplest things can mean the most to them.
If you have tried all of the above and still are asking how to save my marriage, a professional marriage counselor may be your best option. The decision to go to a counselor must be made by both of you as it will not work if you both do not participate fully.
If you are both truly committed to making changes to save your marriage, a counselor can offer unbiased advice to help you. By getting advice from counselor, it may help you see your problems in a different light and help you find solutions.
TEAM Daniel & Boaz
Chennai Top Divorce Law Firm
Helpline:- 9962999008
email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
Daniel & Boaz deals all kind of matrimonial problems giving 24*7 support for your legal needs.
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Girl under 21 must get parents’ consent for marriage: Karnataka High Court
Observing that a girl below the age of 21 years cannot judge the character of a person she marries, the Division Bench comprising Justice Bhaktavatsala and Justice Govindaraju directed police to lodge a suo motu kidnapping case against the petitioner, Avinash of Sudhama Nagar.
The court further observed that a girl below 21 years of age must have the consent of the parents for her marriage. "Parents should choose the boy for a girl aged below 21, as it is they who bear the brunt of an unsuccessful marriage," the Bench said.
Terming as void Avinash's marriage with the girl without her parents' consent, the court levied a cost of Rs 10,000 on him. "The court cannot shut its eyes even when police fail to initiate action," the Bench said. On the petitioner's contention of illegal detention, the court said, "Parents keeping the child with them does not amount to illegal detention."
The girl's parents had lodged a complaint of kidnapping on February 7, 2011, with the Wilson Garden Police after their minor daughter, a second PU student, went missing on February 2 while on her way to college. Avinash had taken her to Krishnagiri where he married her on March 3, 2011, after she turned 18 on March 1.
On returning to Bangalore on March 28, he appeared before the police, who brokered peace between the two families by ensuring that the boy got to meet the girl twice a day and appeared before the police daily. However, when the girl's parents refused to abide by the deal and denied him permission to meet his wife, he filed a habeas corpus plea.
When the matter came up for hearing on Thursday, the Bench lashed out at the petitioner saying, "This is (the marriage) nothing but a case of kidnapping. If the marriage fails, the girl will return to her parents who are the actual sufferers."
The Bench said that parents protecting their child was not illegal detention. "The Hindu Marriage Act is not a contract. It needs permission from parents. (Avinash's case) is nothing but misuse of the girl and her age," the court said.
For information
TEAM Daniel & Boaz
Chennai Divorce Law Firm
Helpline:- 9962999008
email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
The court further observed that a girl below 21 years of age must have the consent of the parents for her marriage. "Parents should choose the boy for a girl aged below 21, as it is they who bear the brunt of an unsuccessful marriage," the Bench said.
Terming as void Avinash's marriage with the girl without her parents' consent, the court levied a cost of Rs 10,000 on him. "The court cannot shut its eyes even when police fail to initiate action," the Bench said. On the petitioner's contention of illegal detention, the court said, "Parents keeping the child with them does not amount to illegal detention."
The girl's parents had lodged a complaint of kidnapping on February 7, 2011, with the Wilson Garden Police after their minor daughter, a second PU student, went missing on February 2 while on her way to college. Avinash had taken her to Krishnagiri where he married her on March 3, 2011, after she turned 18 on March 1.
On returning to Bangalore on March 28, he appeared before the police, who brokered peace between the two families by ensuring that the boy got to meet the girl twice a day and appeared before the police daily. However, when the girl's parents refused to abide by the deal and denied him permission to meet his wife, he filed a habeas corpus plea.
When the matter came up for hearing on Thursday, the Bench lashed out at the petitioner saying, "This is (the marriage) nothing but a case of kidnapping. If the marriage fails, the girl will return to her parents who are the actual sufferers."
The Bench said that parents protecting their child was not illegal detention. "The Hindu Marriage Act is not a contract. It needs permission from parents. (Avinash's case) is nothing but misuse of the girl and her age," the court said.
For information
TEAM Daniel & Boaz
Chennai Divorce Law Firm
Helpline:- 9962999008
email:- divorceadvocate@aol.in
Saturday, December 24, 2011
NRI Husbands- The Dowry Victms
A growing number of Indian American husbands claim to be victims of an Indian law against dowry that has them vulnerable to exploitation - both financial and emotional - by their wives and in-laws.
The complaint is also reflected in support groups and blogs - ‘Batteredhusband’ and ‘Indianbakra’ - in the US, meant for male victims of the Indian legislation.
The anti-dowry law is being misused, say some husbands, while others allege extortion or vindictiveness by wives and their families when it comes to child support or custody.
NRI men apparently get harassed when their estranged wives go to India, at times illegally with the children, and file criminal cases against their ex-husbands with police.
NRI men are vulnerable, agreed a social rights activist here. Not only do they face demands for thousands of dollars to withdraw harassment cases filed against them but are also coerced to give US visas to the wives’ families, he added.
According to activists, there has been a dramatic rise in misuse of the law, with cases reported from the US, Britain and Canada.
The number of cases against Indian Americans has been significant enough for the State Department to publish a travel warning: “A number of US citizen men who have come to India to marry Indian nationals have been arrested and charged with crimes related to dowry extraction. Many of the charges stem from the US citizens’ inability to provide an immigrant visa to prospective spouses to travel immediately to the US.
“The (Indian) courts sometime order the US citizen to pay large sums of money to his spouse in exchange for dismissal of the charges. The courts normally confiscate the American passport and he must remain in India until the case has been settled.”
A group of victims and their friends in the US set up www.498a.org last year. Satya, 30, a victim-turned-volunteer and software engineer in California - who gave only his first name - maintains the site. The number of hits, he said, is an indication of the extent of the problem.
“In July alone we had 100,000 hits,” he said. “About 80 people from the US have filled up a form on the site seeking advice. There are 20 Canadian residents seeking help. We have had about 200 requests for help from the Delhi-Noida-Ghaziabad belt (in India) alone.”
Another victim, Rajeev Mehta, is an associate director of neonatology and associate professor of pediatrics at the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick.
In April 1994, when the New Jersey-based physician met his now ex-wife, Nalini Michelle Gupta, he was one of the highest paid academic neonatologists in the US.
“Soon after we started living together. We got married in October 1994 because she was pregnant. Soon after the marriage, I discovered that she had had numerous failed relationships. I filed for a divorce when I realised that she and her family were using me,” Mehta said.
“After more than three years of divorce litigation in the US and having proved my case before the Superior Court of New Jersey, I obtained a divorce. The court awarded me sole legal custody of my children and determined that Nalini had been cruel towards me, had destroyed my well-paid job in New York and had fabricated a story of domestic violence to counter my divorce petition,” he added.
“Knowing that she was in serious trouble with US courts, Nalini decided to run away to India. In order to carry out the abduction of the children (aged 12 and nine), she claimed that her father was on his deathbed in India and his last wish was to see his grandchildren,” he said.
“In India, my ex-wife filed a false dowry case. For filing this case, she lied and claimed that her parents had given us gifts worth $12,000. She conveniently concealed the fact that ours was not an arranged marriage and we had met and lived together in the US prior to (marrying) solely because she was pregnant,” Mehta said.
Following his ex-wife’s abduction of his children, the US government revoked Nalini’s passport. On July 12, Interpol issued an alert for her, Mehta said.
The delay in the Indian judicial system did not make it easier.
Mehta has written to US Congressmen and Indian politicians and spent several thousands of dollars in legal fees. But he does not see any “resolution in the near future".
Some victims are not even aware of the provisions of the law, activists say.
Californian resident Bhavani Ramamurthy said: “In 2005 my brother’s wife left Texas for India with their child following some disagreement. Later I went to Chennai to attend my mother-in-law’s funeral.
“One day the police came to our home and said my sister-in-law was at the police station and wanted a reconciliation. When my mother and I went to the station, we found my sister-in-law there.
“The police officer turned abusive and took me and my mother into judicial custody. Even though I told the police that neither my mother nor I had ever lived with my sister-in-law, it did not help. Both of us were taken into judicial custody for seven days. The police also took my passport away,” she said.
Bhavani said she and her relatives had to bribe the police to expedite the legal process.
“We paid a lot of money at every stage. For them, we (from the US) were like golden ducks. Till this happened, I did not even know that such a law existed. What amazed me was that the police did not question any of the statements my sister-in-law made.
“We had to spend our days with petty criminals. The woman who made false statements got away scot-free and was not even charged with perjury. Everyone makes money. It is a form of legal terrorism. I still get nightmares thinking of my experience.”
Daniel & Boaz
Helpline: 9962999008
email: divorceadvocate@aol.in
The complaint is also reflected in support groups and blogs - ‘Batteredhusband’ and ‘Indianbakra’ - in the US, meant for male victims of the Indian legislation.
The anti-dowry law is being misused, say some husbands, while others allege extortion or vindictiveness by wives and their families when it comes to child support or custody.
NRI men apparently get harassed when their estranged wives go to India, at times illegally with the children, and file criminal cases against their ex-husbands with police.
NRI men are vulnerable, agreed a social rights activist here. Not only do they face demands for thousands of dollars to withdraw harassment cases filed against them but are also coerced to give US visas to the wives’ families, he added.
According to activists, there has been a dramatic rise in misuse of the law, with cases reported from the US, Britain and Canada.
The number of cases against Indian Americans has been significant enough for the State Department to publish a travel warning: “A number of US citizen men who have come to India to marry Indian nationals have been arrested and charged with crimes related to dowry extraction. Many of the charges stem from the US citizens’ inability to provide an immigrant visa to prospective spouses to travel immediately to the US.
“The (Indian) courts sometime order the US citizen to pay large sums of money to his spouse in exchange for dismissal of the charges. The courts normally confiscate the American passport and he must remain in India until the case has been settled.”
A group of victims and their friends in the US set up www.498a.org last year. Satya, 30, a victim-turned-volunteer and software engineer in California - who gave only his first name - maintains the site. The number of hits, he said, is an indication of the extent of the problem.
“In July alone we had 100,000 hits,” he said. “About 80 people from the US have filled up a form on the site seeking advice. There are 20 Canadian residents seeking help. We have had about 200 requests for help from the Delhi-Noida-Ghaziabad belt (in India) alone.”
Another victim, Rajeev Mehta, is an associate director of neonatology and associate professor of pediatrics at the Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick.
In April 1994, when the New Jersey-based physician met his now ex-wife, Nalini Michelle Gupta, he was one of the highest paid academic neonatologists in the US.
“Soon after we started living together. We got married in October 1994 because she was pregnant. Soon after the marriage, I discovered that she had had numerous failed relationships. I filed for a divorce when I realised that she and her family were using me,” Mehta said.
“After more than three years of divorce litigation in the US and having proved my case before the Superior Court of New Jersey, I obtained a divorce. The court awarded me sole legal custody of my children and determined that Nalini had been cruel towards me, had destroyed my well-paid job in New York and had fabricated a story of domestic violence to counter my divorce petition,” he added.
“Knowing that she was in serious trouble with US courts, Nalini decided to run away to India. In order to carry out the abduction of the children (aged 12 and nine), she claimed that her father was on his deathbed in India and his last wish was to see his grandchildren,” he said.
“In India, my ex-wife filed a false dowry case. For filing this case, she lied and claimed that her parents had given us gifts worth $12,000. She conveniently concealed the fact that ours was not an arranged marriage and we had met and lived together in the US prior to (marrying) solely because she was pregnant,” Mehta said.
Following his ex-wife’s abduction of his children, the US government revoked Nalini’s passport. On July 12, Interpol issued an alert for her, Mehta said.
The delay in the Indian judicial system did not make it easier.
Mehta has written to US Congressmen and Indian politicians and spent several thousands of dollars in legal fees. But he does not see any “resolution in the near future".
Some victims are not even aware of the provisions of the law, activists say.
Californian resident Bhavani Ramamurthy said: “In 2005 my brother’s wife left Texas for India with their child following some disagreement. Later I went to Chennai to attend my mother-in-law’s funeral.
“One day the police came to our home and said my sister-in-law was at the police station and wanted a reconciliation. When my mother and I went to the station, we found my sister-in-law there.
“The police officer turned abusive and took me and my mother into judicial custody. Even though I told the police that neither my mother nor I had ever lived with my sister-in-law, it did not help. Both of us were taken into judicial custody for seven days. The police also took my passport away,” she said.
Bhavani said she and her relatives had to bribe the police to expedite the legal process.
“We paid a lot of money at every stage. For them, we (from the US) were like golden ducks. Till this happened, I did not even know that such a law existed. What amazed me was that the police did not question any of the statements my sister-in-law made.
“We had to spend our days with petty criminals. The woman who made false statements got away scot-free and was not even charged with perjury. Everyone makes money. It is a form of legal terrorism. I still get nightmares thinking of my experience.”
Daniel & Boaz
Helpline: 9962999008
email: divorceadvocate@aol.in
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
498 A Misused
In the cases Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand (decided on August 13, 2010) and Ramgopal v. State of M.P. (Order dated July 30, 2010) relating to Section 498A, the Supreme Court of India has observed that complaints are not always bona fide and are at time filed with oblique motive. The Court has, inter-alia, requested the Law Commission of India to examine different aspects of Section 498A including that of making it compoundable. Giving this information in written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha today Shri Salman Khurshid, Minister of Law & Justice, said that the Law Commission of India has considered the above decisions of the Supreme Court of India. As per the information received by the Commission, more than one lakh cases are pending. The subject relating to Section 498A has been discussed at the meeting of Law Commission of India held on 31st October, 2011 and in the light of deliberations, the Law Commission will prepare the Report which will detail the need to make the offense under Section 498A IPC ‘compoundable’ or not. The Report will also deal with other aspects relating to Section 498A such as making it bailable, process of arrest, conciliation etc.
From the desk of Daniel & Boaz
Helpline:- 9962999008
From the desk of Daniel & Boaz
Helpline:- 9962999008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)